#29. Travels In The Scriptorium. Paul Auster. Fiction. 4 stars.

switched it up to a straight fiction novel, instead of a short fiction collection this week, and really enjoyed myself. i have previously only read Auster’s City of Glass and that was long ago (while in college which was shockingly long ago actually) and i feel i’ll have to give it another read. all i remember of City of Glass was feeling really really depressed. but i’m depressed these days whether reading a depressing book or not, so i suspect i’ll have a lot more intelligent thoughts about it on a second, more mature read.

i really enjoyed Travels In The Scriptorium, despite the fact that there is very little closure and i was left with more questions than answers by the time i finished. perhaps it bothered me less not to have closure here than in Beattie’s Follies because in Follies i knew it was going to happen to me over and over again, whereas in Auster’s novel i knew it was just going to be the one time. i’m not sure.

Travels was beautifully written and totally engaging from page one. i think the lack of closure might be frustrating for a lot of people as it really does leave you completely hanging about both what happened to the characters to bring them to this moment in the novel, and also what will happen to them in the future. you really learn very little and much is left to the imagination. would i prefer this book if Auster had spent another 150+ pages filling in the gaps? maybe. but there is a story within a story in Travels and that informs much of what i suspect Auster wants you to do on your own.

as said previously, i remember little of City of Glass, but i suspect this style (and how much is given and withheld) is vintage Auster, and so fans of his will likely not be disappointed. it was very interesting. beautifully executed. 4 stars.

080508145302lzzzzzzz.jpg

so i get it now.

all the hype about Tao Lin.

i just finished #28 – You Are A Little Bit Happier Than I Am. Tao Lin. Poetry Collection. 3.5 stars

this poetry is powerful and unique stuff. he writes in a very distinctive voice (much like his novel Eeeee Eeee Eee) but it worked powerfully for me here, where in his novel i had trouble connecting, here the beautiful language was enough and i didn’t feel let down for not being able to connect, that didn’t seem to be the point. perhaps that isn’t the point for Lin in his novel either, but unfortunately it is something i do look for. i’ll have to try a short fiction collection of Lin’s next and see if that works for me as his poetry did.

other than reading (or hearing) my friend Anis Mojgani’s work i don’t think i’ve been as satisfied with a poetic voice as i was with Lin’s since i first discovered Bukowski. not that i am comparing them, they couldn’t be more different except for in their power. a few favorites from You Are A Little Bit Happier Than I Am: Some of My Happiest Moments In Life Occur On AOL Instant Messenger; Things I Wanted To Do Today; I Want To Start A Band; Pessimism? Or Robotics?; It’ll Get Different; I Honestly Do Not Know Who This Poem Is Directed At But I Still Somehow Wrote It With Conviction; and Things You Have Emailed Me.

if you like poetry, or feel like trying some out, i would highly recommend Lin’s book. interesting stuff.

41epdmuh1ul_aa240_.jpg

#27.  Follies.  Ann Beattie.  Short Fiction Collection.  3.5 stars

i’m not quite sure what to say about this book, i enjoyed it, but it ultimately left me wanting.  i think her stories were beautiful, and unlike many collections i read, they were all very even in that none stood out more than others as better or worse (which i think i like, although i seem to also be complaining about it, so who the hell knows what i like).  there was a certain level of quality to all of the pieces and it was nice to know walking into a new story that it was going to deliver as the others had. 

i also enjoyed the realism in her stories.  i completely believed her characters, i suppose in part that is because she writes somewhat melancholy and bittersweet stories that move slowly and deliberately, as life tends to.  her characters make the choices her characters would make, they never step out of line and do the unexpected, and while that may sound boring, i think grabbing on and translating that kind of realism is actually quite difficult, especially in short fiction where you have a short amount of time to nail those things down.  unfortunately, because of her realisitc sparse way of writing and the somewhat non-dramatic real life circumstances her characters find themselves in i didn’t find myself too attached to any of the characters. but her writing was beautiful, and i enjoyed it consistently throughout and the stories flowed flawlessly into one another, though there is no obvious link.

i guess my biggest problem with the book overall is that the endings didn’t do it for me.  i do so love it when my short fiction (or poetry…maybe even novels) have a snap to them.  not a twist ending or anything out of nowhere, but the idea that they kind of come around to something.  some kind of resolution or something…anything.  it’s funny because my mother loves her entertainment (movies, books, television shows) to be very tied up in a neat little bow, whether sad or happy, she likes to at least KNOW.  i have always complained to her that this is not an interesting way to look at things and that often the answers are given, just less obviously, and that you just have to look.  so it is ironic that i am now crying out for more closure.  strange.  perhaps i got lazy during her book and didn’t pay enough attention, or am just not smart enough to get it in the first place, but none of the stories had a ‘snap’…that thing i love that in the last few pages makes reading a story all the more fulfilling. 

still good though.  i’ll have to read more of Beattie’s work, she’s been quite prolific and except for a few stories in collections here and there this is the first of her work that i’ve read.

beattie.jpg

ps – LOVE the cover.  so cute, and relevant to what is within…

it speaks for itself i think…

panelone.jpg

so i was watching whatever the hell that show that used to be called Ebert & Roeper (which was first called Siskel & Ebert) is now called this weekend to see what they had to say about this weeks films.  not that i generally trust Roeper and whoever his accomplice for the week is (although this week the accomplice was pretty good – i think it was the guy from The Village Voice), but if it’s on and i’m around, i’ll watch.  notably missing this week was an actual mention of whether the films in question actually got a thumbs up or down.  i mean it was pretty obvious from the review, but i kept waiting for that official thumb ruling.  i thought first that they must have changed the format and that they were going to recap with the thumb rankings at the end, perhaps to get viewers to hang in until the end credits.  no such luck.  no mention of thumbs anywhere.  my experience seemed a bit empty.

so yesterday, my boyfriend sends me this link to explain away our confusion:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070825/ap_en_tv/tv_ebert_thumb_ban

basically Ebert, on death’s door as he is wont to be over the last few years, has apparently “exercised his right to withold the ‘thumbs’ until a new contract is signed”.  geez man.  c’mon.  the show has been pretty respectful about putting in guest hosts, but never settling on even a “temporary replacement”.  he is often mentioned on the show and anyone over the age of, i don’t know 25 maybe? knows about his existence and his part in the “creation of the brilliance that is the thumbs up” (read: sarcasm).  how can you even copyright a thumbs up, weren’t people doing that shit casually forever before he put his name to it?  in fact, i feel like blaming him for actually starting this whole copyrighting nightmare (i.e. Trump wanting to copyright “you’re fired” and the myriad of idiocies before and after that).  stop holding on so damn tight Ebert.  let Roeper take it over already.  nobody is trying to push you out except the universe man.  just let it go. 

perhaps this is why being a critic instead of a creator is bad.  it eventually makes you be like this…makes you hold on to something you believe you invented because you slapped your name and logo on it, and you believe this because you never did anything creative and good in your whole life. 

now onto my next book review!  joke. 

this show just keeps getting better and better.

and let me just say thank you to the tv gods that it followed the season finale of big love last night, because it took me at least that long to calm down anxiety wise and i was able to do that in large part thanks to the lighthearted hilarious-ness that is Conchords.  no thanks to Entourage though, that show is so in love with itself at this point that it just makes me want to throw up, while it is being so in love with itself, it doesn’t even bother to be funny.  i don’t think i’ve laughed once in the last handful of episodes i’ve watched.

on the other hand, i thought i was going to pee my pants last night watching Bret and Jemaine dressed as Frodo and Sam from Lord of The Rings for their music video. 

funniest. episode. ever.

conchords.jpg

this is not from last night’s episode, but is so hilarious, i had to post it when i couldn’t find one of them dressed as Frodo and Sam…

big love is the best drama on tv. except now i have to wait like nine more months for another episode. *sigh*

the season finale was as awesome as the whole season was. we’re finally starting to get our old and lovable margene back, the manipulative little bitch that she turned into for the last handful of episodes just had to go. i am so invested in these characters. my friend Brooke would say that i think they’re real (i don’t…but just barely).

i’ve been thinking, ever since my last post, about my feminist issues and why i’m so in love with this show and i think that the reason is threefold.

1> it is just a really great high quality show. good writing, good acting, music, direction, it is all there (although they are dropping the ball on that horrible FBI agent or whatever she is, with the terrible accent that drops in and out – what’s happening here guys?).

2> the show actually challenges my thinking, which i love. i am forced in literally every episode to rethink preconceived ideas that i have been living with.

3> despite these women being first, second, and third wives, this show has the most powerful and fully developed female characters on television. whether you love them or hate them (or the situation they are in) you spend more time dealing with who they are and what they are dealing with than on any other normal show, where even when a show is well done, women often play second fiddle. not the case on this show. and in addition to Barb, Nicki, and Margene who obviously get the most screen time and are thus the most fully developed at this time, the female supporting roles are incredibly strong as well – Lois, Adaleen, Wanda, and Sarah most of all lately are all surprisingly interesting and three dimensional and just amazing, despite limited screen time. in fact, let’s take a minute to look at the paths the women of big love have been put on, as of our season finale…

[spoilers possibly abound]

Barb. oh how i love thee. i guess because i identify most with her since she is most unconvincingly on the path of polygamy (which is likely how i would feel on that path). we know that she came to this “arrangment” under duress. i suspect, though it has not been said outright, that she never would have agreed to this situation unless she was genuinely concerned that she was not going survive her battle with cancer, and wanted to insure that her family was in good hands. in this case Nicki’s. in the finale she makes moves to finally accept the life she is living, by outing herself to the neighbors, it is like finally admitting it to herself, and the pain was palpable. if you think about Barb’s arc since we met her, it has been one form of denial after another that this was the life she was living. last season she had an affair with her own husband that lit her up like a child. you could see her fantasies as clear as day that he was going to run away with her and their “original family” back to their old/normal life. given the opportunity i don’t think she would hesitate for a second, despite her genuine love and affection for the rest of the family. and then this year, she did everything to separate herself and make something of her own by going back to school. she loves her family, but it is not the family she wanted and dreamed of, and watching her next year to really come to terms with that and deal with the reality of her situation and possibly the acceptance of it, will be a sight to behold.

Nicki. oh Nicki, how conflicted i feel about you. i love Nicki, but man does she throw me for a loop. unlike the other characters, whose motivations i feel are quite clear, Nicki is a complicated mess, and it is so enjoyable to watch the writers (and Sevigny) put the pieces of her together. Nicki is constantly surprising me. despite her extended family ties and obligations and her minor machinations, she does, in the end, tend to honor her family. and despite her claim that she is in the family because she believes in the testament, and not because of romantic love, it is obvious that her romantic love for Bill is powerful. and her love for the others is pretty evident as well. you would think with all Nicki’s desires for power and the constant frustration of being the second wife, that she would want Barb out of the picture, in fact the opposite is true, and when that reality raises its head she is the first to try to fix things, to make sure that her family remains intact. she is always surprising me, and never more so than in the finale when she defied her father to his face, and with nobody watching her thus able to give her approval. i’ve never been more proud of her. she’s a badass.

Margene. oh Margene, how i’ve wanted to strangle you for the last four or five episodes (ever since your mother showed up actually) and never more so than in this episode, until you re-emerged as your true self in the last few minutes. i understand Margene’s frustration this season, but it was one i have empathized with the least. she knew what she was getting into when she signed on for this multiple marriage situation, and so stamping her feet and throwing little tantrums and putting the family in jeopardy over her manipulations has been endlessly frustrating, especially because for the first half of the season i was more in love with her and her innocence and enthusiasm than ever. so it’s good to have her back, but i’m still mad at her. especially with this whole fourth wife/Ana nonsense. it would serve her right if they got a fourth and she suddenly found her newness and thus power stripped away. that said, i don’t want a fourth (especially after that scene in the closet with Bill & Ana) . the whole situation quite frankly upsets me, as does Nicki’s comment to Margene in the finale that “Bill’s dating life is none of our business.” WHAT?!?!?!?!? my head almost exploded.

okay, lastly i’m going to talk about Sarah, arguably the most interesting character on the show. she is developing into an amazing woman. and while this comparison will possibly draw fire, i think she is infinitely more interesting and complicated a character than Claire from Six Feet Under. a lot of people loved Claire, and i didn’t dislike her, but i found her more interesting early on, more and more as i watched that show she turned into a bratty annoying character, and the one i was least interested in watching. Sarah however, is fascinating and so not the selfish self absorbed teen that Claire was (although perhaps, like Claire, she is headed in that direction, time will tell). i am saddened that Sarah gave up her virginity to a guy that obviously isn’t going to be “the guy” and it will inevitably cause her a lot of heartache, however, what she is going to go through next season, having let sex and more complicated adult relationships into her life is going to be fascinating, and i hope, it will give her some perspective and aid in her transition into the empowered woman that she is already on the road toward becoming. on that note, poor, poor Benny. how lost is that little one? reeling after losing a teenage love/lust relationship and just grasping at anything around him to hold him up. and congratulations Bren for dodging THAT bullet.

so basically what i’m saying is that a show about polygamy is actually the most female centered and feminist show on television. there. i said it.

if you haven’t been watching the show, pick it up on DVD as soon as it is released. i can’t recommend it enough.

biglove.jpg

…is not on this blog, but i’m going to link to it…

let me first preface this link by saying that Brett Ratner is the definition of a hack.  seriously, if you go to my dictionary, under the word hack it says Brett Ratner and there is a little picture.  yes, i wrote it in and drew a cartoon of him in sharpie on the page, but still, i’d trust it.  someday all your dictionaries will be as advanced as mine.  in the meantime, you can read this absolutely hilarious bit from McSweeney’s Internet Tendency:

http://mcsweeneys.net/2007/8/24molyneux.html

ps: McCarthy’s The Road was the best book i’ve read so far this year.  if you haven’t read it yet, read it now, even though if you a buy a copy now it has that tell tale Oprah sticker on it, which annoys the hell out of me.  it’s still worth it. 

by far one of my favorite artists/cartoonists/comic book gods working today is Jeffrey Brown. he’s my pick today for comic of the week. i do actually plan to have my comic out sometime this week (i know, i’m shocked too), but i’d like to get in the habit of posting comics on Mondays, so here is some work from Mr. Brown, since i’m not quite ready yet (and since his work is far superior to mine anyway, you’re actually getting a great deal).

while Jeffrey Brown does not have a “journal comic” to speak of and is much more established and well known than Les and Drew (see previous comic of the week posts) he does work in a journal style. his comics are very autobiographical and the truth of them is sometimes heartbreakingly honest. my favorite of his works is Unlikely, but Clumsy and AEIOU are almost as good and are the companion pieces to Unlikely in his “relationship trilogy”. he also is prolific in his mini-comics and pieces that can be found in collections and anthologies.  if you like what you see here in these two simple panels please check him out at the link below:

http://www.margomitchell.com/thc/jb.htm

jbsamp3.gif

jbsamp5.gif

#26. The Subway Chronicles. Edited by Jacquelin Cangro. Essay Collection. 3.0 stars

i picked this collection up mostly as an acknowledgment of how much i owe to New York City in its effort to help me become a better writer. i doubt New York City cares (or tried) to make me (and probably many others) become a better writer, but it happens nonetheless.* the inspiration and incident factor alone can make you a better writer without even trying. i often fear if i return to Los Angeles (or anywhere else for that matter) that i will suddenly have nothing to write about. that my actual experiences (overheard, seen, or otherwise) will plummet and i will have literally nothing but my imagination to guide me (never good).

this was a decent collection, solid and enjoyable. some really nice pieces and very few “losers” in the bunch. but there was nothing that really blew me away. i didn’t really come away from it with anything more than a pleasant feeling of having enjoyed myself and being ready to move on. i guess i generally want and expect more from my essays and short fiction than that, which is why it doesn’t rate a higher score. if you’re a new yorker born and raised, you can probably add at least half a star to my rating.

*it is still up for debate whether i have actually become a better writer since living here, and basically i have no actual proof of such a statement. requests for proof of any improvement will be casually ignored.

subwaychronicles.jpg

oh yeah, and this marks the halfway point of my goal of 52 books and 52 reviews this year.  yippee!  i figure i’m about 8 books behind.  yeesh.

« Older entries § Newer entries »