villains-gallery-sketch

I thought you guys might enjoy a teaser sketch for a drawing I’m working on for a Jilted League “Villains Line Up”.

Here we have, from left to right:  ‘The Mos”; Evil Catholic Schoolgirls (Mary Jane, Mary Pat, Mary Rose); MCP aka Male Chauvanist Pig; and The Supermodel and Regular Model.

There are three more pieces to this sketch so far…if you ask nicely maybe I’ll post them in the coming days.  Who knows how long before the final (yes, with color!) drawing goes up.

And please, let’s not hassle me about the fact that all their feet are a bit cut off.  It’s partially the scanning, and it’s partially I’m always bad about getting the feet to fit on completely the page when I sketch…but Adam’s already given me enough crap for that to cover you all…

Have a great weekend everyone.

delicateediblebirds

Delicate Edible Birds.  By Lauren Groff.  Short Fiction Collection

Wow.  I really don’t even know how to begin.  I’m always complaining that my biggest problem with short story collections, which I read frequently, is that when viewed as a whole,  they tend to be uneven.  In other words, some stories are amazing and others are just “eh”.  Recently I read a collection by Katherine Shonk titled Red Passport and was surprised because it was the most well balanced collection I had read in years, unfortunately, though I enjoyed the collection, I was ultimately really let down by the way she chose to end each of the pieces, thus keeping it from being the fulfilling experience I had hoped for.  So the world must have heard my whining and complaining because it sent me Lauren Groff’s wonderful and delicious Delicate Edible Birds.  In fairness, the world sent me Groff’s book through a fantastic new blog called Andrew’s Book Club (so thank you Andrew!).

I don’t think I’ve read a collection this spectacular since, well quite frankly I’m not sure I ever have.  It is certainly the best contemporary collection I’ve read in recent memory.  I’m not sure it can beat out one of my long time favorites, Nine Stories by J.D. Salinger, but I’m also not sure it’s fair to compare the two.  Contemporary short fiction is very different I think than reading classic collections by authors like Salinger and Hemingway.  Mind you I’m not making a judgement that contemporary short fiction is better or worse – just different.  In the past I’ve had trouble comparing them (apparently I still do).  Regardless, I can’t think of a real flaw in Groff’s entire collection.  Every single story was moving, engaging, emotionally resonant, and beautifully crafted.  She had interesting ideas that hooked me from the first lines, and finely crafted characters and even her simplier tales moved me, twice to tears and once (in the title piece Delicate Edible Birds) to an impotent rage that I don’t think I’ve ever experienced before in reading a short story.  Amazing.

Every single story delivered.  The one story that I would select as my least favorite (Fugue) was still a fine story, but I did find it a bit confusing with many female characters/names, and a deliberately confusing storyline that involved amnesia and multiple location shifts.  It had the least emotional resonance for me, and delivered the least in the end for me of all the pieces.  I’d list my other favorites, but that’s probably all the rest of them, ah hell, I’ll list them anyway:

Lucky Chow Fun begins so simply, but has an incredibly powerful undertow running throughout it, constantly threatening to drag you under.  This story threatens terrible things, but refreshingly, only delivers some of them, which is accurate I think to how life really works and serves to make the story that much more powerful.

L. Debard and Aliette is a haunting and lovely tale about true love and Romeo & Juliet level ‘missed connection’. This one though beautiful and full of wonderful moments, has a terrible bite to it that shocked me in its intensity.

Majorette is a brutally honest and desperate little gem about a family that begins and ends in ways I never expected.

Blythe is a sharp and cutting tale about art and women and the human perspective that I found wonderfully enjoyable.

The Wife of the Dictator is an exposing tale of politics and gossip, told in the third person omniscent “we” that I have only experienced once before (in Joshua FerrisThen We Came To The End) and which I thought he handled well, but that few others could manage without sounding like pretentious jerks.  Suffice to say there is not a pretentious jerk to be seen in Groff’s story, and in fact, it is somehow the perfect perspective for a group of gossipy women stuck on the outside of a situation, bored and judging.  It works exceptionally well.

Watershed in the hands of a lesser writer could be cliche and overwrought but is instead beautiful and desperate and horribly horribly sad and real, poignant in a way most writers aim for and miss by a mile (me included).  Watershed moved me to frequent tears.  No small feat.

Sir Fleeting wonderfully charts the life of a woman and her life long flirtation with a dashing man that never really manifests in the ways she expects.  This story was fascinating in its ability to turn expectation (both the character’s and the reader’s) on its ear.  Really solid stuff.

And Delicate Edible Birds.  I suppose of all of those that I loved, Watershed and L. Debard and Aliette stayed with me the most – until I read the last piece, the title piece, Delicate Edible Birds, which truly moved me in a way I have never before been moved in a short work.   Birds, written in third person seemlessly tells the story of five reporters in France during World War II, the transitions were so smooth and the characters so well drawn that it almost felt like five different first person tales…I had to go back while writing this actually to confirm that it IS in fact written in third.  It is.  Brilliant.  And this story, which kept me rapt with every turning page, left me naked and angry and helpless in its last sentences.  Which is not a bad thing…in fact it’s like some kind of storytelling miracle.  If it wasn’t so perfect as is I would have begged for more.

Groff has a novel out there as well, The Monsters of Templeton, which I’ve added to my list of books to buy, and I suggest you run, don’t walk, to your nearest bookstore for both of these as well.  5.0 Stars (out of 5).

Best American Comics 2008

ELEANOR DAVIS is the 1979 Semi-Finalist’s ARTIST OF THE WEEK.  I came to Davis’ work actually through her boyfriend and often partner in crime, artist Drew Weing, whose journal comics were one of the original inspirations for me trying out journal comics myself, and who will be featured as Artist of the Week on his own sometime soon.  I wanted to write about Davis now though because every time I look up I seem to be seeing more of Davis’ amazing illustration and comic book work. I don’t think I could get away from her if I tried – not that I ever would.

She recently illustrated the cover to The Best American Comics 2008 (see above) and she is constantly popping up in Mome a collection Adam and I both love that is always full of the best independent comic work out there.  Her amazing Seven Sacks, featured in Mome’s Spring 2007 issue is completely brilliant and as testament to its brilliance is also included in The Best American Comics 2008.

Seven Sacks

Excerpt From Seven Sacks

Davis has a unique style that is part horrible and disturbing and part playful and fun.  Some of what she draws is quite frankly the stuff nightmares are made of, but she draws it all in such a way that you can see there is so much more than nightmare there.  It’s almost like her work allows you to identify with the monster first and so seen from the monster’s perspective you can’t help but shrug your shoulders when you see what horrible things they might do…as if to say that horror is really all matter of perspective.  Her endpapers for Wide Awake 666 are a good example of this:

endpaper1

endpaper2

See?  Hard to care…those monsters need to eat too, right?

Read the rest of this entry »

youngblood

“Most of the great graphic novels are gone, and ‘Youngblood‘ is one of the few comic books left with tentpole potential,” Ratner said.

This from a CBR story that Youngblood has been acquired for Brett Ratner to direct for mid-six figures.

I can’t even begin to take apart Ratner’s statement because it’s so ridiculous.  Also, anyone that knows ANYTHING about comics and graphic novels can tell you he doesn’t know a god damn thing about comics based on this sentence.  Which kind of explains the whole X3 nightmare.

I guess the silver lining in all of this is that Youngblood sucks pretty hard already and Ratner sucks the biggest amount possible, so they’re kind of a match made in heaven.  Since Ratner’s goal in life seems to be going around ruining awesome stuff (again – the X Franchise, among other things) then I’d rather he’s kept busy on something that kind of sucks to begin with.  As Adam put it when he brought my attention to this article – “a perfect storm of suck”.  Well said Adam, well said.

Tags:

Vinyl

Not quite, but I’m surprisingly close.

Who is Alan Zweig you ask?  Alan Zweig is a talented documentary filmmaker with a grim (though not unwarranted) outlook on life.  I came across Zweig’s films, as I come across many great things, via Adam.  Thanks Adam!

A few weeks ago I was trying to work (I think it was writing) and Adam put in Zweig’s documentary Vinyl.  My attempt at working did not last long as I was drawn in from the office to the living room repeatedly by fascinating, funny, introspective, and really sad stuff I was hearing in Zweig’s fascinating film.  We both fell in love with Zweig’s Vinyl, partly because it’s just a wonderful documentary about collectors of vinyl and partly because Adam and I both suffer from obsessive compulsive collecting to a certain degree…not for vinyl, but for various kinds of media…it is worst in me for books and comic books/graphic novels, it is worst in Adam for film as he’s managed to mostly curb his inner comic collector.  Regardless, I guess my point is that we were really able to relate to the people Zweig interviewed (including Zweig himself), but from a slightly safe distance – though collecting is a bit of a problem for us – mostly financial – it hasn’t managed to take over or shape our lives (yet?) in the way that most of Zweig’s subjects admitted it does for them.

The film Vinyl is an unflinchingly honest documentary about collectors, and what and why they love what they love, and also why they have sometimes come to hate it.  Zweig himself is incredibly frank about the fact that he believes his collecting gets in the way of his life – particularly for his relationships and general growth as a person living a “normal” life.

Being throughougly entranced by Vinyl (released in 2000) Adam quickly hunted down Zweig’s other two documentaries, I,Curmudgeon (2004) and Lovable (2007), these in combination with Vinyl are often referred to unofficially as his “Trilogy of Narcissism” and the title fits, in the best sense of the word.  All three documentaries are executed in a very stripped down interview style.  There is no fancy lighting, or great sets.  The interviews are almost exclusively shot head on as medium-ish shots, in the subjects’ own homes, with the exception of Zweig’s “confessional” interviews with himself where he shoots just his head/face in a mirror.  I suppose this would drive some people crazy, but I found it charming, and honest.  Zweig is far more open I think and vulnerable talking to himself in the mirror than he would be in a more professional or staged setting, or if being interviewed by someone else.  He knows exactly the questions he wants to ask, and he is brave about not dodging the ones that have horrible answers, or worse, the ones he doesn’t actually know the answers to.  It’s almost like watching someone in therapy.  But real therapy, not some staged witty version of what is usually written for “realistic” therapy sessions.

I, Curmudgeon in a nutshell is about being a curmudgeon…being a person that can’t just be happy and go with the flow.  The people he interviews range from just sarcastic and bitter to chronically depressed.  Zweig considers himself a curmudgeon, although he seems mild in comparison to some of his fellow curmudgeons.  This was by far the most depressing of the documentaries – perhaps because I related to it too much.  I don’t really consider myself a curmudgeon, and I doubt people I know would categorize me that way, but I absolutely have a dark sarcastic side and I often suffer from bouts of depression and I find myself either annoyed or confounded by people that just seem happy.  Unlike most of the people in Zweig’s film I’m pretty good at hiding it (not good for me by the way) and I’m very socially ept.  I suspect many of Zweig’s interview subjects would actually take issue with me empathizing with their problems…but I do, and I love that someone even wanted to make this film – it is so outside the realm of “traditionally acceptable subject matter” for mass consumption.

Loveable is Zweig interviewing solely women, women who are single and have been for a very very long time, some to the point of having always been single.  Because Zweig contstantly ruminates in his films about finding love and a real life partner I can’t help but feel a small part of him hoped through his new film to find a woman that felt as unloveable as he did, and that they could be loved by one another, thus pairing off two people previously incredibly lonely.  I don’t begrudge him this (we all want to be loved, right?) and I don’t think it affected his film, except perhaps in the editing room (some of the scenes run a bit long or repetitive).  I suspect he fell in love with all of these women a little bit, as they were all pretty amazing, and yet touched with the same sadness that he is. Overall it’s a gripping and almost shocking documentary in that it really is surprising that some of these women are single and have always been single.  A couple of them I nearly fell in love with myself.  In the end, though I thought the film was excellent,  it is the subject matter I related to the least (I have ended up lucky in love if nothing else in my life) and thus it was less powerful for me than his other two films.

In the end I can’t really recommend Alan Zweig or his films to just anybody, a lot of people will hate what he’s done here, however, if you’ve read this review and “get it” you should probably check him out immediately.  For the record, here are the ratings (out of 5):

Vinyl – 4.5 Stars

I, Curmudgeon – 4.0 Stars

Loveable – 3.5 Stars

rejection1

Ah, thank the gods we are almost to the end of the Phase II (2008 ) short fiction rejections.  I’m ready to start with a clean slate!

So you know what this cartoon means – I got another rejection.  This one was unfortunate, because last time that I submitted to this highly competitive mag I actually got an encouraging handwritten note on the back of my form rejection.  Because of that note, I revised a piece I had been working on that seemed right for them and submitted it almost immediately following my rejection.  Alas, there is no hand written note of encouragement on this new rejection.  It’s good I’ve learned this lesson though, some of these magazines are out of my league right now.  I mean you don’t just go out and get the Olympic gold on your first try right?  You have to work your way up winning local, city, state, regional, etc., before you go for the gold, right? 

So I’m trying to be optimistic (see “glass half full cartoon“)…Phase III begins shortly as my new 2009 submissions get rounded up and I have at least a dozen pieces both old and new that I want to submit this year already, so wish me luck.

For those keeping score, here are the updated stats:

Updated Phase II Stats: 0 for 6 in Phase II (2008 ) and one piece still out there, trying its best.  I should know within the next month or so on that piece.

Updated Overall Stats:  1 for 13 overall since I started submitting in Phase I (2007) with one piece still out there fighting the good fight…

glass-half-full-postable

Yeah, at 9am I’m thinking, “this is a great opportunity…my chance to really give my itty bit of talent a shot”…around 9:05 I’m looking at my bank account balance and crying into my eggs.  Good times folks, good times!

Red Passport Cover

The Red Passport.  Katherine Shonk.  Short Fiction Collection.

I read a lot of short fiction collections because I love short fiction, and as much as I enjoy reading them, when it comes time to write a review I always have the same problem with them…they’re always uneven.

Some stories are awesome at unheard of levels and others are either disappointing or just average.  I had the exact opposite experience with this collection by Katherine Shonk, The Red Passport.  It was incredibly consistent – which I had genuinely begun to believe was not possible in short fiction collections, and which excited me – but unfortunately in the end it was consistent in a way that disappointed me.

I think with every story in Shonk’s eight story collection (with the exception of maybe one story that I had difficulty getting into The Young People of Moscow) I was drawn into her exquisite world instantly.  Her proverbial hook was placed early, and within the span of a few paragraphs at most I felt I just had to know what was going to happen to her characters, but with every story, without fail, I was disappointed in the endings (ironically I think the ending that worked the best for me was in The Young People of Moscow).

Like any reader I like a certain amount of closure or understanding in the things I take time to read, but unlike readers of kind of mass fiction (I’m generalizing here) I think I’m less prone to need perfect closure or happy endings or everything worked out nicely – I appreciate some ambiguity – I like to have to really think about what is going to happen to these characters…and what could happen…after the sentence ends.  But Shonk didn’t even give me a chance to point her characters in a direction.

It almost felt like I would be reading along, enjoying a beautiful narrative piece, and then all of a sudden it would veer into almost experimental fiction.  Some readers might really love this technique, but it really didn’t work for me, and it was a let down and a surprise every single time (apparently I don’t have much of a learning curve).  Ultimately I was left incredibly sad by the collection, because for me it seemed like such wasted brilliance…like every story was 95% complete and wonderful, and then 5% just unfinished and not committed to…and that 5%, especially when it’s the ending is really important.

I’ll definitely be taking this lesson into my own work, as often when I write short fiction I like more ambiguity than I think my potential readers would wish for…I’ll be examining many of my endings in the future…trying to put just enough there to satisfy.

Of the stories, I liked Kitchen Friends the least overall, and loved Honey Month the most, but was also the most disappointed in its ending.  The Conversation, The Death of Olga Vasilievna, Our American, My Mother’s Garden, and The Wooden Village of Kizhi were all wonderful, until that last 5% where I just felt completely unfulfilled.

In the end I’m giving the book 2.5 stars because the writing is phenomenal – the details and characters are fantastic, and I loved the fact that all the stories took place in Russia, which was fascinating, but in the end, not being able to deliver that last 5% really killed it for me.

Since I keep track of what I read on this blog I want to post that I finished the book Superpowers by David J. Schwartz.  But I’m not going to post a review (or a starred rating) because considering the book I’m writing I guess I feel almost like it’s a conflict of interest.

The second post I ever made on this blog was a review of Soon I Will Be Invincible, which I took down for the same reason.  Feel free to call me out on this, but I really feel icky about talking about these books considering my own work in progress.

lately1

 

lately 2

 

Yeah, I am definitely feeling on the precipice of a great and powerful I don’t know what…is it on the precipice of greatness, or ultimate failure, or destiny, or just the precipice of unemployment…I guess only time will tell…let’s all pull for “greatness” shall we?

« Older entries § Newer entries »