writing

You are currently browsing the archive for the writing category.

So in some backwards kind of way I got a writing acceptance this week….here’s the story…

A couple weeks ago my issue of Tony (Time Out New York to the uninitiated) came and it was an issue titled “Awwww….Ewwww” and on the stark white cover was a picture of a cute little kitten (Awwww) and a disgusting realistic (and large) cockroach (Ewwww). The problem is that this horrible cover caused me to think, every time I looked at it that the realistic looking cockroach was the real thing. Within 24 hours I had been forced to put that issue in the recycling bin, which pissed me off as I didn’t get to read the whole thing.

So I did something unusual for me, I wrote a letter (an email really, and really only like four or five sentences…I’m not sure that qualifies as a letter) bitching about the cover. It was dripping with sarcasm, my email, which I hope they “got”. Anyway, long story short I got an email from the TONY letters department and my “letter” is not only being published, but I won ‘Letter of The Week’ (which basically means I get published, identified as Letter of the Week, and I get Time Out Publication of my choice – I chose 1,000 books to change your life – and I got it yesterday – talk about fast service!). Anyway, I suspect it will be in this week’s issue (today probably) and if not today than next Wednesday.

While this is nice/fun news, I sure would trade it for some other acceptances…*sigh*.

Also of note is that this is only the second time I have ever written in to complain/ask questions/give commentary to a publication, and both times I have written in, I have been published (the other time was to an X-Men comic book when I was but a teenager). I guess I have found my calling. Unfortunately it seems rather unfulfilling.

If you live in the NYC area check for my TONY Letter today, it’s incredibly exciting. Not really.

_004-kt-comic.jpg

I have been reading McSweeney’s Internet Tendency everyday for the past week or so (why wasn’t I doing this for my whole life? I have no idea, the only excuse is that I’m a complete idiot…the stuff over there is just hilariously brilliant…or brilliantly hilarious, whichever you prefer). McSweeney’s posts new stuff every day, so you, like me should go there every day, but I wanted to bring your attention to this gem by Matthew Duverne Hutchinson titled “A Few Years After The Complete Collapse Of The Global Economy, A Consumer Reporter Reviews The IPhone”. It’s wonderfully fun.

Unfortunately neither Firefox nor Safari are allowing me to link things for some reason, so you’ll have to follow the path below to get to it. Or of course you can click on McSweeney’s on my home page and go to the Internet Tendency. Enjoy!

http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2007/10/5hutchinson.html

Capitalization

so a few friends have asked why i don’t use capitalization on this blog.

mostly it is an aesthetic choice…i just prefer the way lowercase letters look…especially “i”…why should it be capitalized?  it doesn’t make sense…i guess I just don’t feel that important that I should be capitalized.

also, and this is a bit renegade of me, but who made up these capitalization rules in the first place?  it seems a bit arbitrary to me.  i’ve never been the greatest fan of “official grammar” and “perfect sentence structure” in writing (which i suppose is obvious if you’ve been reading this blog).  i like to think that things can be beautiful and well written (and well spoken) without catering to the sometimes clausterphobic rules of “the man”

lastly, i like the more casual informal look that it gives to my (or anyone’s) writing…as if you are looking in on someone’s thoughts, or a private conversation, instead of something more formal and structured.

that said, again for largely personal reasons, i’ve decided to switch over and bow down to “the man”.  As of this post…and this sentence…all posts on 1979 Semi-Finalist will be done with proper capitalization.  As for proper grammar?  I can’t promise anything there, but I’ll do my best. 

go now and read this great short fiction piece about time travel called Troubleshooting Guide for TimeCorp’s VH3928-Model Time Machine today by Jonathan Baude & J. Alex Boyd on the McSweeney’s site…it’s hilarious.  definitely worth the read, especially if you’re a fan of the idea of time travel and the all the crazy nonsense that must come with it.

there is also this completely awesome selection of very short fiction pieces by three authors (Eggers, Manguso, and Olin Unferth), as a promo for their book called One Hundred And Forty-Five Stories In a Small Box.  number 49 by Sarah Manguso, which you can read here, is a measly 73 words, and completely blew my mind.  i love it when someone can blow my mind in only 73 words.  i’ll be picking up this book as soon as humanly possible.

you should too.

so i thought about spending all this time prefacing the strip, saying how this is not the style i hope this strip will turn into, that i am still experimenting with brush pens since my inking is so shitty in this one, that i would prefer to use a standard three panel strip but that more often than not my “gags” need more flexibility than that, that i have been sketching a lot to try to bring my drawing level back to what it was three years ago (which was still not great), that the only thing i draw worse than drawing myself is a big perspective shot, that i’ve always been and always will be a better writer than an artist – so hopefully the writing gags will rescue the pitiful art…whatever…it’s all just bs.  here’s the strip and we’ll see what comes of it.  enjoy – and thanks for reading.  as always, your feedback is welcome…unless it’s about the shape of Adam’s head (Josh that means you!)

ps – i was trying to think of a good name for this strip, but everything i came up with was incredibly cheesy…so suggestions are welcome.  if someone actually comes up with a great title that i can use maybe they could win a crappy original sketch…signed by yours truly…

the formatting of this blog is not great for comics as the column is too thin.  i’m going to have to consider changing my format if comics are going to continue to be at the forefront on this blog.  in the meantime, you need to click the thumbnail below to get a readable version.

_001ktcomicstripr.jpg

you know who i really dislike, despite the fact that i have never met her and cannot give you one good reason for disliking her, except for the fact that i think she’s a shitty actress?  that’s right, Sean Young. 

i can’t put my finger on it, but she annoys the hell out of me, to a really insane degree.  anyway, for some reason, despite the fact that she’s sort of a has been/never was, Entertainment Weekly is doing a cover story on her (why? i don’t know…i don’t ask these questions anymore…mostly because nobody answers me).  so i am kind of loathe to give her the free press of my dozens and dozens of readers (that’s you!) but i posted the link to the full story below. 

she’s so pathetic in the interview that i actual started to feel a little sorry for her, but then she just continued being whiny and annoying and fake and psycho and comparing herself to Julia Roberts (are you kidding?) and saying she has at least as much charisma as George Clooney (are you KIDDING?!) and so my ‘sorry feelings’ evaporated like fine mist and i just went back to hating her again.  this is one of those few times that Hollywood seems to agree with me and has forcibly kept her on the sidelines…it feels good when a powerhouse like Hollywood finally agrees with you.  it feels like delicious satisfaction and let me tell you, i could get used to it.

as a sidenote, i’ve been compiling a list…you know how i love lists dear reader…of the “10 Most Overrated Actresses”…Sean Young would be #1 on it, but since she isn’t really “highly rated” i guess she’ll just have to get an honorable mention, as only women who are actually getting good roles in Hollywood (for no reasons understood by mankind…or, well, me.) should be on the list.  anyway, here’s a link to the full story, in which you can feel writer Karen Valby’s palpable disdain for her, you can feel Valby trying to like her and Young just cutting her off at every pass:

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20056516,00.html

ps – no picture of Sean Young because i hate looking at her (even though she says “humor and beauty are two things that come naturally to her” yuck – i just threw up a little bit) and i don’t want her image posted on my blog…ever.  it was painful enough to write her name and link to a story…

UPDATE:  this is not a “cover story” in Entertainment Weekly, it is just “a regular story”…the cover i saw in the current article (but didn’t bother to read the caption on) was a cover story they did on her back in 1992…she didn’t warrant a cover story back then to my mind either, but at least she could have been considered “entertainment news” back then.  sorry for the error!

i’ve been reading girl-wonder.org off an on for the last month or so and generally enjoy what she has to say over there, but never have i agreed with her more than in her post of September 9th 2007.  check it out if you find yourself interseted in comics, feminism, or better yet, both.

http://girl-wonder.org/girlsreadcomics/

normally i wouldn’t count a comic book, unless it was a really impressive graphic novel or a long collection or trade, as a “book” especially for my review/goal purposes, however i am both WAY behind on goal, and the quality of the books i read this weekend was so high, and also quite frankly i think i read almost 60 comic books on sunday and so, well, it took all day and i’m counting it. 

feel free to call bullshit on this if you like in the comments (i’m sure Josh will). 

this all started because i was at the always awesome Jim Hanley’s on Saturday (of course they did not have a copy of James Jeans’ Process Recess 2, so i’m disappointed, but whatever).  anyway, here i am and as usual i somehow find myself in the X-Men section (why does this always happen?  must be my childhood rearing it’s head).  so i bought a copy of Astonishing X-Men #22 (the current issue).  Astonishing X-Men is currently written by Joss Whedon and i am a huge Joss (therefore Buffy) fan and the art, by John Cassady, was impeccable.  so i take it home Saturday night and read it.  it was awesome.  the best comic book (excepting The Walking Dead or the original run incarnation of Supreme Power) that i have read in an age. 

so this began a quest to get and read the previous 21 issues, so i could actually know what the hell was going on.  suffice to say that was done with much assistance from Adam (thank you!).  and i absolutely loved the whole damn thing.  every issue was beautiful and brilliant.  a smaller cast (primarily Scott Summers/Cyclops, Dr. Hank McCoy/Beast, Kitty Pryde/Shadowcat, Emma Frost/White Queen, and Peter/Piotr Rasputin/Colossus, and Logan/James Howlett/Wolverine) made much more time for character work and beautiful art mixed flawlessly with Joss’ spot on dialogue – sparse when necessary – dense only when absolutely necessary.  in a word, beautiful.  and i’m officially back on the train.  i’ll be buying this book until Marvel fucks it up and breaks up the dream team, which happens in comics more times than a fangirl like myself can count.  Astonishing X-Men #1 – 22. Whedon/Cassady. 4.5 stars.

Update: after a little research i find out that the “dream team” of Whedon and Cassaday is pretty much already broken up.  apparently this book has had problems being on time and Whedon had only committed for a certain amount of time.  the book is scheduled to be taken over by Warren Ellis and Simone Bianchi.  Warren Ellis is a huge talent so maybe that won’t be so bad, i’m going to try to stay positive.  i’m not familiar with Bianchi, except for cover art, which is good.  i can’t imagine anything being up to Cassaday’s work, but i’ll give it a try.  the problem for me often with art is that even if the penciling is good, if the layouts are ridiculous it is pretty hard for me to enjoy it.  that is one of the beautiful things about Cassaday’s work – those panel layouts are just gorgeous.  i can’t tell exactly when this new arc starts, but i’ll be holding my breath until then i guess.

frost.jpg

so maybe you’re wondering where i came up with 60 books, when i clearly only read 22 books…well after reading astonishing i had to go back and dig up the Grant Morrison run on The New X-Men as i felt astonishing borrowed heavily from that history (i.e. in Whedon’s Astonishing Jean Grey is dead…but i didn’t know how…and that felt wrong).  i had picked up single issues here and there of Morrison’s amazing run on New X-Men, but never the whole thing.  between Adam and i however we pretty much had issue #114 – #150, which was exactly the run i was looking for. 

so after Astonishing i dug in to Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely’s take on The New X-Men.  as i remembered, these issues were amazing.  and the art?  foget about it.  Quitely is the master.  his layouts are gorgeous and his pencils are sublime.  i never can get into his women’s faces as much as i’d like (they always look a bit pinched and “older”) however he has a way of drawing that is so not the traditional plastic look of superheroes…you can almost feel the flesh, it’s beautiful.  the only downside to the art is that with such a long run (114 – 150) there were times when guest pencillers had to step in and while there were a few stars in there, sometimes the quality really dropped considerably. 

Morrison is a genius and it’s evidenced in where he took these characters that so many of us have seen everything already written about…i guess that’s the point really isn’t it? it’s not just what you’re doing to the characters, it’s how you’re constructing it and how everything bounces off of that construction.  i felt the arc (ending with 150 and Jean Grey’s death) really lost me in the end.  i somehow suspect Marvel and not Morrison as i remember there was a lot of controversy over this book – i believe it was getting critical but not commerical success, which can often drive a book into the ground and perhaps Morrison was getting pressure to make it more accessible.  i’ll add an update if i find anything about that.  regardless, overall it was a great run, one of the best (and most important) in the X-Men “history”.  The New X-Men #114 – #150.  Morrison/Quitely 3.5 stars.

since i’m making these two books share one spot (#32) on my books reviewed list i’m going to split the difference between them and give #32 an official 4 stars.  fair enough?

frost1.jpg

okay, well maybe only for a fanboy/fangirl like me, but it is still a great site.

Adam sent it to me today:  http://www.ifpthendirt.com/interviews.html

each envelope contains an interview with a great (truly great!) artist of the comics persuasion.  Adam sent it to me because of my open love for Jeffrey Brown (second envelope down on the left) but also present here is Robert Crumb, Joe Matt, James Kochalka, and Adrian Tomine.  all amazing, all favorites.

make sure to click on the page when you are ready to advance to the next page.  what a great idea…such an organic and personal way to interview someone…i suppose it could be interpreted as ultimately impersonal since there is no actual meeting taking place, but because it is the writer/artist/creator actually responding exactly how they want to, with no filter from a magazine or reporter/writer it is actually incredibly personal.  a great idea.  the only thing i would suggest is adding a clear date on the pages as it is difficult to tell when the interview was returned to Dirt, unless you can read the envelope, which in most cases you can’t.   

as a sidenote, Dirt has his own strip that he does and which can be found on his site.  his stuff is funny and interesting, not necessarily up my alley, but you should check it out as it might be right up yours (for some reason that sounded dirty…sorry).

below is page one from Jeffrey Brown’s interview:

brown1.jpg

« Older entries § Newer entries »